FTB Or Tekkit?
20 replies [Last post]
random_ninja14
Contributor
Contributor
WoM Member: 575072
WoM Coins: 515

Knowing PvP is being discontinued, I thought why not make a FTB or Tekkit server to fill its place instead of hunger games?

Let your dicision be known by letting us know what you might think would be best!

Tekkit

Feed The Beast

Hunger games

 

Also just becuase there's more votes than other doesnt mean its going to happen, Snow might reject this idea any way, but hey, why not give it a shot!

mgslymen99
Epic Contributor
Contributor
WoM Member: 606084
WoM Coins: 1124
Yup

That would fullfill all my life dreams!!!!

This would be absolutely amazing, sadly it would be dificult. As a once server host of ftb, its very very rescource intensive... Maybe World of Minecraft could start a campaign of doantions for an ftb servr? See if it were possible to make a new server?

If they do World of Minecraft:FTB has one player right here !!!

:D

Stormfur1234
Contributor
Members
WoM Member: 181985
WoM Coins: 186
TEKKIT

FTB is ok, but it just doesn't have the good equivalent exchange. Also, energy condenseers just make tekkit like 90% better :D

So out of those 3 I would pick HG because I already play tekkit. 
(Unexpected, Right)

Prodigy0114
Contributor
Contributor
WoM Member: 568928
WoM Coins: 953
I would choose tekkit if it

I would choose tekkit if it was up to me. smiley

Yenwood
Staff Memember
Community Managers
WoM Member: 325067
WoM Coins: 1644

FTB and Tekkit are both very resource intensive, which is the reason we removed PvP. Was using too much resources, lol.

liquid_lightning
Epic Contributor
Contributor
WoM Member: 547233
WoM Coins: 1712

If by Hunger games you mean survival games, you know that snow DID  say he was making the survival games cluster.

jak2131
Epic Contributor
Contributor +
WoM Member: 191805
WoM Coins: 6608

If the worry is how resource intensive something is, why do we have so many things on smp that we don't need?

Gorakkhowk
Contributor
Contributor
WoM Member: 282019
WoM Coins: 496
We don't need another server.

As much fun as it would be for Tekkit or FTB, the amount of pipes and quarries running would cause an intense amount of lag. Hunger Games isn't a bad idea but we would need a certain number of people to be able to play a match, such as 6-12. This is why we had a contest for an arena, so that we can have another reason for people to get on, and benefit from the winner and get a new mini-game to play. 

ssfdre38
Epic Contributor
Contributor +
WoM Member: 369733
WoM Coins: 1405

The reason why pvp is going down is cause its resource heavy. Both tekkit and ftb are resource heavy as well. Snow already have something that will replace it.

mgslymen99
Epic Contributor
Contributor
WoM Member: 606084
WoM Coins: 1124
Which brings me to my next point..

I have played many many modpacks.. 

Out of all of them Feed the Beast Ultimate is trhe most fun. In tekkit once you get powerful you get way to powerful and there is really no point in doing anthing else. Any ideas on the donation idea? Also maybe there could be only 20 slots instead of 40 on the ftb server.

ssfdre38
Epic Contributor
Contributor +
WoM Member: 369733
WoM Coins: 1405

again it doesnt matter its RESOURCE HEAVY, pvp was using more resources then SMP and CMP combined at the same time so Tekkit and FTB will be the same way. if snow is removing PVP cause of that, why would he replace it with a server that is the same resource heavy

BronzeBlaster
Contributor
Contributor
WoM Member: 422242
WoM Coins: 281
Guys..

Look, ftb and tekkit is EXTREMELY fun, but it's so resource heavy it'd lag so bad. Also, hunger games has already been announced, so this topic is pointless.

random_ninja14
Contributor
Contributor
WoM Member: 575072
WoM Coins: 515

the reason pvp went down is becuase not that many people were on it 24/7 like SMP is, FTB or Tekkit would be much more resource intensive but people would actually play on it alot, gives more of a challenge.

Also if there would be somthing like FTB snow could have restrictions on things like quarry's, limiting the size to only 20 by 20, which the biggest is 64 by 64. banning world anchors and such, things can be removed or limited depends what it is. literally all the servers that use the FTB or Tekkit Plugin ALWAYS has restrictions on what you can use and what you can. nothing is plain.

 

Maybe snow can do a week trial of FTB, see how many people join and see if the machine snow uses can handle it.

random_ninja14
Contributor
Contributor
WoM Member: 575072
WoM Coins: 515

Also if you didnt notice, PVP was around for a long Time until now. it was resource heavy back then, so why didnt it shut down back then? It was becuase of the amount of people that played on the PVP server.

If FTB had a large player base then why not use it? of course the only way to find out is if it was a running server.

ssfdre38
Epic Contributor
Contributor +
WoM Member: 369733
WoM Coins: 1405

again FTB and Tekkit will NOT replace PVP as snow has something else in its place and will NOT change his mind

MrSnowGlobe
WoM Manager
WoM Admins
WoM Member: 147545
WoM Coins: 3691
Answers

@Jak Whats on SMP hardly effects performance

@Random We shut PVP down becuase its resource intensive ways were no longer justified becuase of how inactive it became.

FTB and Tekkit are off the table.

random_ninja14
Contributor
Contributor
WoM Member: 575072
WoM Coins: 515

for now

 

>:D

Prodigy0114
Contributor
Contributor
WoM Member: 568928
WoM Coins: 953
1 Point for random. ;D

1 Point for random. ;D

uplusion23
Forum Moderator
Forum Moderators
WoM Member: 171471
WoM Coins: 898

Hunger Games and many servers like Feed The Beast and Tekkit irritate me. I haven't a clue why, but they do. PvP Is an average concept of most gaming today, so I understand why that is and will always be a popular gamemode, but in my opinion, I believe there should be focus on both World of Minecraft Realms, and SMP, rather than purely updated versions of Minecraft. Classic was such a great success, but needed to be continued. As players play, they need some change, which could have been solved by development of more lua commands, better web management, deals, etc., while SMP could always be improved with new ideas, less server-intensive plugins that offer the same usage, and multiple servers such as "smp1.womjr.com, smp2.womjr.com, etc." accessable via inter-server portal. Those are just my opinions though. 

mgslymen99
Epic Contributor
Contributor
WoM Member: 606084
WoM Coins: 1124
Heres an amazing idea that is totally unplausible...

A Realmsserver with redpower? Redpower adds microblocks, and cool redstone things...

MrSnowGlobe
WoM Manager
WoM Admins
WoM Member: 147545
WoM Coins: 3691
.

@uplusion We don't have access to realms, so thats off the table. There are other neat ideas in the pipeline but i'm only one person. We have inter-server portals in a lobby server. Perhaps you should actually jump on and see what we have running ^_^